Traditional media still lives on

November 17, 2011, 10:12 AM GMT+0

Using BrandIndex data for brands such as YouTube and Netflix, CEO Stephan Shakespeare explains why we shouldn’t write off traditional media yet

Last week I had the pleasure of two days of pure blue skies at the Monaco Media Forum. As you hope and expect at these gatherings, there was also a confusing barrage of blue-sky thinking. One speaker was working on a project to develop the 3D printer concept by investigating the practicality of printing a warm gourmet meal. Maybe that is little way off; most of the presentations focused on whizzier ways to advertise using micro-targeting and social media.

At the gala dinner, I sat next to a seasoned New York ad exec who might have walked straight off the set of Mad Men. He warned me against over-enthusiasm on the futurology front, caustically remarking: 'You see these great claims for the future but right now we’re not even using a fraction of the technology they already have.'

It turns out all that much-vaunted clever tracking and precision-placement of personally relevant ads hardly ever really happens – maybe three per cent of banner ads are truly targeted, he said. And one of the presidents of Warner Brothers reminded us that if Netflix were in a league table of networks, it would come 81st. Even YouTube would struggle to be in the top-ten for shares of eye-balls.

Looking at those two brands in YouGov’s BrandIndex, YouTube certainly performs well, scoring around +40 on the Index score (a composite of six key measures) but still trails the BBC, which at around +50 is consistently one of the strongest performing of the 850 or so brands measured. Netflix has barely registered in the UK, but its well-publicised troubles in the US saw its Index score fall from a high of +41 this summer to +12 today.

So, although new media has made great strides we would be foolish to write off the role of more traditional forms just yet.

This article also appears in City AM

Go to BrandIndex